![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Contents | Send Email |
|
Here is a brief description of the results of six economic studies that have been conducted by Florida Stewardship Foundation and related organizations (including Florida Stewardship Foundation's successor, Stewardship America). For information on how you can order full copies of these studies -- plus a video describing the results of the Hillsborough County study -- go to the Publications Page. | Summary of Results | |
|
|||||||||||||
| The dollar value ratio of community
revenues generated to expenses incurred by land use for existing agricultural and proposed
residential and commercial/industrial uses. The long-term costs and/or benefits that would accrue to taxpayers as a result of a plan to spend $140 million to purchase development rights from landowners. The intent of this plan was to keep the area available for agriculture while compensating landowners for the fair market value of any development rights that they might give up. The opportunity cost represented by an acre of agriculture calculated on the basis of its current use -- horse farm, green houses and nurseries, fresh vegetables, frozen and fresh fruits and fruit juices. The value gained or foregone when agricultural land is converted to other uses -- such as the proposed mixed-use residential and commercial/industrial development -- comparing economic impact through the use of economic multipliers. Another section -- on infrastructure costs that would be incurred as a result of the proposed mixed-use development and the deficit or surplus that would remain after all impact fees were paid -- was added to the study in January, 1995 and the final study was delivered to the county on October 3, 1995. |
|
| The study indicates: Land that remains in row crop production can generate up to $685,000 per acre more for the county's economy on a cumulative basis over a 50-year period than if houses are built on the land -- an average of nearly $14,000 per acre per year in additional economic activity. (This assumes revenues from crop production remain more or less stable; it also assumes an average housing price of $250,000 per home, about $100,000 more than the average priced home at the time the study was conducted.) Numbers for Palm Beach County's horse industry are even more impressive. A horse farm can attract much more revenue to local communities and the county than a subdivision ... $4 million per acre more on a cumulative basis over the same period. That's a statistical average of $80,000 per acre per year! A nursery also can generate more than houses ... $4.5 million per acre more on a cumulative basis over the same period. That's almost $91,000 per acre per year in additional economic activity. The number of nurseries in the county, however, cannot be significantly expanded. This is because the market will accommodate only a limited number of nurseries, if they are to remain economically profitable. Agricultural land -- of all types -- contributes significantly to the tax base. For every $1 generated in tax revenues, agriculture requires only 12 cents for infrastructure and services, leaving 88 cents to support other county needs. Conversely, residential development of the type proposed for the Agriculture Reserve would require $1.10 in services for every $1 generated in revenue. Agriculture keeps on generating revenue for the county year after year. Although residential use generates significant one-time revenue, it gradually becomes a liability, because of demand for services, such as police and fire protection, schools and roads. The highest and best use of land may not be residential development, if high-value agricultural uses are being displaced. Adoption of a proposed Purchase of Agricultural Conservation Easement program -- and an expenditure of $140 million to purchase development rights -- could save taxpayers $477 million over a 50-year period, compared with the costs of allowing the area to be converted out of agriculture in favor of development of 25,880 homes and 485 acres of commercial/industrial establishments. REFERENCE: Bevin Beaudet, CH2M Hill, Inc.,800 Fairway Drive, Suite 350, Deerfield Beach, FL 33441. Telephone (954) 426-4008. Mr. Beaudet was formerly Deputy County Administrator with direct responsibility for all contract worked carried out by Farming for the Future on behalf of American Farmland Trust, including the study described above. |
|
Also:
REFERENCE: Joe Stephany, Ph.D., Chair, Lake Soil and Water Conservation District, 32235 Merry Road, Suite C, Tavares, FL 32778; (352) 343-2481 or (home) (352) 669-5293. Contract Administrator. |
|
Other findings show:
|
|
The Analysis of Community Revenues & Expenses shows:
Also:
|
|
The Opportunity Cost Analysis shows that:
Present Value:
REFERENCES: Cliff Topping, Project Manager, Committee of One Hundred, Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce, 401 E. Jackson Street, 21st Floor, Tampa, FL 33602; (813) 276-9412. Contract Administrator. Gene Gray, Special Assistant to the County Administrator, Office of the County Administrator, Hillsborough County, 25th Floor, County Center, P.O. Box 1110, Tampa, FL 33601; (813) 272-6210. County Agricultural Liaison. Chip Hinton, Executive Director, Florida Strawberry Grower's Association, P.O. Box 2631, Plant City, FL 33561; (813) 752-7653. Chair, Hillsborough County Agricultural Task Force.
|
|
Results of the Collier County study indicate:
|
|
The Analysis of Community Revenues & Expenses shows:
Also:
|
|
The Opportunity Cost Analysis shows that:
Present Value:
REFERENCES: Glenn Simpson, Vice President of Environmental Services, Wilkison & Associates, 3506 Exchange Avenue, Naples, FL 33999; (941) 643-2404 Ron Hamel, Executive Director, Gulf Citrus Growers Association, Inc., P.O. Box 1319, LaBelle, FL 34616; (941) 675-2180 |
|
The Analysis of Community Revenues & Expenses shows:
Also:
|
|
The Opportunity Cost Analysis shows that:
Present Value:
|
|